He vehemently needs to fight the future earnings issue, and start claiming that she's not entitled to shit when she ended the marriage. Once the marriage is over, it normally says in divorce judgments/orders that neither party is allowed to go after the other party's assets from the date of the filing of the final divorce judgment. If it is going to be allowed to have divorce asset litigation go on forever in divorces, especially since the parties divorced and are no longer man and wife, but actual strangers, he should turn around and sue her for breach of the divorce agreement and claim the children as is, since she cannot afford to raise the children on her own.
There was a recent case of a senior middle eastern chap who's wife divorced him. I think it was in UAE. There's full property rights and rule of law there so she got nothing much out of him.
But she went to a London family court to file. And he was ordered to give her $700m.
This gets me thinking... How much to take out a contract on her?
Imagine if the Queen consort divorced the King. She'd take half the commonwealth. It's getting absurd.
Isn't there's a strong motivation for a divorce resolution industry if a corrupt family court orders outrageous things that flout basic property rights and rule of law?
Basically husbands are declared outlaws so they might as well roll with it.
The marriage strike will be real.
If USA family courts print thousands of new divorced per day, how many suicides? How many self defense strikes against a corrupt state?
Each false judgement erodes the legitimacy of the state.
YET ANOTHER REASON never get married!!!
Will men ever wake the F up???
He vehemently needs to fight the future earnings issue, and start claiming that she's not entitled to shit when she ended the marriage. Once the marriage is over, it normally says in divorce judgments/orders that neither party is allowed to go after the other party's assets from the date of the filing of the final divorce judgment. If it is going to be allowed to have divorce asset litigation go on forever in divorces, especially since the parties divorced and are no longer man and wife, but actual strangers, he should turn around and sue her for breach of the divorce agreement and claim the children as is, since she cannot afford to raise the children on her own.
There was a recent case of a senior middle eastern chap who's wife divorced him. I think it was in UAE. There's full property rights and rule of law there so she got nothing much out of him.
But she went to a London family court to file. And he was ordered to give her $700m.
This gets me thinking... How much to take out a contract on her?
Imagine if the Queen consort divorced the King. She'd take half the commonwealth. It's getting absurd.
Isn't there's a strong motivation for a divorce resolution industry if a corrupt family court orders outrageous things that flout basic property rights and rule of law?
Basically husbands are declared outlaws so they might as well roll with it.
The marriage strike will be real.
If USA family courts print thousands of new divorced per day, how many suicides? How many self defense strikes against a corrupt state?
Each false judgement erodes the legitimacy of the state.