Arrested for a Vacation: How Eleanor Leclair Ballester's Case Exposes the Arbitrary and Broken American Family Court System

In a country that claims to value freedom, justice, and the best interests of children, the arrest and ongoing imprisonment of Eleanor Leclair Ballester tells a very different story—one of corruption, inconsistency, and systemic abuse.

On April 1, 2024, Ballester, a 34-year-old mother, was arrested in Lake County, Florida, accused of "kidnapping/deprivation of custody" and "fugitive from justice" — not for trafficking drugs, not for smuggling weapons, and certainly not for harming her children. Her "crime"? Taking her children on a vacation to Florida.

The nightmare that followed has trapped her in a legal web spanning two states, multiple courts, and thousands of dollars in legal fees, all while being separated from her children for over a year. Her case is a glaring indictment of the American family court system, revealing how the so-called "justice" system picks and chooses whose rights are protected, whose parenting is honored, and whose lives are destroyed.

A Simple Vacation Becomes a Criminal Case

Ballester's arrest stems from a custody dispute in California with her ex-husband, Samuel Nathan Martinette. She contends that she was simply taking her children on a vacation. Yet, authorities treated her as a dangerous criminal, initiating extradition proceedings between Florida and California.

Compare this to countless cases—like my own—where one parent brazenly violates a custody order, even taking a child overseas (to Greece, in my case), and courts do nothing. In my situation, my ex-wife traveled internationally with our son during my court-ordered parenting time, had him baptized abroad against my wishes, and the court refused to even hear my complaints. No contempt, no enforcement, no accountability.

Ballester didn't leave the country. She didn't endanger her children. Yet she sits behind bars, treated like a felon. What is happening here?

The Broken Machine: No Constitutional Rights in Family Court

Ballester’s case exposes a reality most Americans don't realize: Family courts are not courts of law. They are administrative tribunals operating under "best interests" policies with no jury trials, no consistent application of constitutional protections, and a shocking lack of accountability.

In Ballester’s case, she faced a restraining order issued in San Diego County, California by Commissioner Leah Boucek — a commissioner Ballester claims had personal connections to her ex-husband. She alleges that the order was issued without evidence of harm and that Boucek should have been disqualified due to conflicts of interest. In response, Ballester filed multiple civil rights lawsuits under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of her Fourteenth Amendment rights.

Despite these serious claims, the system steamrolled ahead. She attempted to remove her California criminal case to federal court, citing violations of her right to a speedy trial, equal protection, and freedom from excessive bail. The federal court refused, hiding behind the "Younger abstention" doctrine, which shields states from federal oversight even when constitutional violations are alleged.

In Florida, her habeas corpus petition challenging her extradition continues to languish. She remains jailed without resolution, without her children, and without justice.

Who Are the Courts Protecting?

It is impossible to ignore the selective enforcement of family court orders. In cases like mine—and thousands of others—parents are denied access to their children with no consequence to the offending parent. When fathers complain, courts often ignore or gaslight them. But when a mother like Ballester crosses an invisible line, the full weight of the criminal justice system falls on her.

This arbitrary and retaliatory enforcement is not about protecting children. It’s about maintaining control, generating revenue through litigation, and perpetuating the myth that family courts serve justice.

Ballester’s prolonged incarceration only traumatizes her children further—something the courts hypocritically claim to care about. What is served by depriving a child of their mother for over a year? What "best interest" is achieved by jailing a non-violent parent instead of exploring peaceful remedies like mediation or supervised visitation if concerns existed?

The answer is simple: there is no rhyme or reason. Our judicial system is broken.

A Case Study in Injustice

Ballester’s ongoing federal and state battles paint a chilling picture. She has been forced to:

• Litigate simultaneously in Florida and California

• File multiple habeas corpus and civil rights lawsuits

• Fight an unconstitutional extradition process

• Challenge family court decisions steeped in alleged judicial bias

• Endure separation from her children with no clear timeline for reunification

All while being treated like a dangerous criminal, rather than a mother who took her children on a vacation.

Meanwhile, truly abusive and negligent parents often skate through family courts with little scrutiny, shielded by the very system that claims to protect children.

The System Isn’t Just Broken — It’s Abusive

Eleanor Leclair Ballester’s case shows what happens when courts abandon constitutional principles. Without due process, without equal protection, and without accountability, the law becomes an instrument of oppression rather than justice.

Ballester is not alone. Across America, countless parents are caught in this Kafkaesque nightmare, their children collateral damage to a system more concerned with preserving its own power than safeguarding families.

Until we recognize that family courts operate outside true constitutional law, and demand serious reform, we will continue to see mothers and fathers destroyed, children alienated, and lives ruined by a system designed not for justice, but for control.

Ballester’s case is a warning: if it can happen to her, it can happen to anyone.

---