When “I’m Tired” Breaks a Family: The Silent Weight Carried by Fathers Like Us
There’s a narrative quietly taking over family life—one that says women have the right to say “no,” to tap out, to walk away from marriages, families, even children, when they’re tired, overwhelmed, or “not feeling fulfilled.” It’s become so normalized, so wrapped up in the language of self-care and empowerment, that no one dares question it anymore.
But we’re going to. Right now.
Because that same story—the one that gives permission to leave without consequence—destroyed my family. And it destroyed someone else’s too. Maybe yours?
Behind the polite language and the pop psychology lies a trail of devastation that never seems to make it into the spotlight: fathers who are doing it all, silently, without help, without recognition, and without an ounce of room to be tired themselves.
A Modern Father Doing Ancient Work
He’s over 60. Divorced. Raising two young sons on a full-time parallel parenting schedule. He gardens, keeps bees and chickens, runs a small business, manages real estate, and still has the strength to stay physically active.
He also homeschools his boys, takes them to reading tutors, cooks home meals every day, handles the laundry, the piano lessons, the field trips, the summer camps, and the bedtime routines.
He does all of it. Alone.
And yet the system—and the culture around it—still dares to imply that he, and dads like him, are somehow less-than. Or worse: that their pain doesn’t count.
As he put it:
“I’m doing everything a mom would do except birthing and breastfeeding, which I admit are not small. But there are plenty of dads out there who would deeply resent the idea that we’re not capable or not trying hard enough.”
And he’s right.
My Story: Erased by “No”
I know this resentment intimately.
My marriage wasn’t destroyed by betrayal or even a slow drift. It was destroyed by silence. By the repeated "no’s." The disconnection. The withdrawal. The story that “I’m tired” was justification enough to dismantle a family, and that as a man, I should just “understand” without protest.
But here’s the thing: I was tired too. I was managing disability. I was working. I was parenting. I was showing up. But unlike her, I didn’t get the right to walk away. Or the right to make up false accusations to do it.
Instead, I lost my home. My career. My child. My sense of purpose. And any protest was met with suspicion, or worse—court orders based on narratives that didn’t come close to the truth.
The Problem with the “I’m Tired” Justification
We need to talk about what happens when a parent—especially a mother—is socially and legally allowed to walk away from their duties without consequence.
This isn’t about diminishing mothers. It’s about asking a real question:
What happens when only one side is given permission to check out?
What happens to the kids?
What happens to the fathers who never had the option to give up?
Because if a man did the same thing—said “I’m tired” and left—he’d be crucified. Called a deadbeat. Possibly jailed.
But if a woman walks away? She’s “finding herself.”
The Quiet Weight of Male Caretaking
This father said something that floored me:
“No one has ever been a caretaker of me, except when I was a baby. And even then, I was in an incubator.”
That line stopped me cold. Because it speaks to something no one talks about: the lack of care that men receive.
We are caretakers. Providers. Emotional anchors. Co-parents. Full-time parents.
But no one takes care of us.
And society doesn’t even pretend to try.
What Responsibility Really Looks Like
We both agree on something that feels controversial these days:
If you bring a child into the world—man or woman—you are responsible for that child.
For life.
That means your needs don’t always come first. That means sacrifice. That means growing up.
Too many adults today want the title of “parent” without the weight that comes with it. They want the praise of responsibility without the inconvenience of it. Same can be said for the title of “wife,” or “husband.”
But parenting is messy. Unfair. Exhausting. And sometimes, yes, soul-crushing.
And still — it is our job. That includes not shutting out the other parent, unless they truly are a danger.
A Final Word on Moral Direction
He ended one of his comments with something simple but piercing:
“Drill a little further down, and you’ll find moral direction. Heaven forbid.”
He’s right.
We don’t just need reform. We need a recalibration of what it means to be a parent and a spouse.
Not just love.
Not just rights.
But responsibility.
Sacrifice.
And yes—moral direction.
Because no child should have to pay the price for a parent’s unprocessed trauma, unmet dreams, or unresolved identity.
And no father—especially those showing up like this one—is “less than” because he dares to stick around, do the work, and expect the same from the person who helped create that life in the first place.
To all the tired dads doing it all anyway: we see you. You are not alone. Keep on gettin’ er dun.
And to the rest of the world: It’s time to tell the whole story.
—Michael Phillips
Father. Writer. Rebuilder.
I've raised three sons on my own since my ex-wife walked away in September of 2018. Last time they saw her was Xmas of 2020. No calls, no cards on their birthdays, nothing. Bare minimum in child support (and even then, it often goes unpaid). I've come to expect no sympathy or support from society, police, schools, or my community, because I've never received any. Plenty of malicious persecution, groundless welfare checks, and judgment, though. Benign neglect is the best I hope for from any of them.
There's a study that compares the mortality rate of single parents to married. Found that single fathers have TWICE the mortality rate of either single mothers or married men/women. Truly a testament to the enormous pressures placed upon a man raising his kids alone and the lack of support they endure.
Love your writing. Keep up the great work. 🙏❤️👍
Maybe it's time to stop the bullshit when the Judge tries to enforce child support but will not enforce parenting time/parental rights. Here's a sample of what one guy did on a motion when he got tired of being pushed around by the courts (not in family court): The motion which Plaintiff filed was entitled "Motion to Kiss My Ass" (Doc. 107) in which he moved "all Americans at large and one corrupt Judge Smith [to] kiss my got [sic] damn ass sorry mother fucker you." Washington v. Alaimo, 934 F. Supp. 1395 (S.D. Ga. 1996).
Here is an exchange between Defendant and Judge, which US Supreme Court held it was NOT contempt. The case is Mayberry v. Pennsylvania, 400 U.S. 455 (1971):
Petitioner's conduct at the trial comes as a shock to those raised in the Western tradition that considers a courtroom a hallowed place of quiet dignity as far removed as possible from the emotions of the street.
(1) On the first day of the trial petitioner came to the side bar to make suggestions and obtain rulings on trial procedures. Petitioner said: "It seems like the court has the intentions of railroading us" and moved to disqualify the judge. The motion was denied. Petitioner's other motions, including his request that the deputy sheriffs in the courtroom be dressed as civilians, were also denied. Then came the following colloquy:
"Mr. Mayberry: I would like to have a fair trial of this case and like to be granted a fair trial under the Sixth Amendment.
"The Court: You will get a fair trial.
"Mr. Mayberry: It doesn't appear that I am going to get one the way you are overruling all our motions and that, and being like a hatchet man for the State.
"The Court: This side bar is over.
"Mr. Mayberry: Wait a minute, Your Honor.
"The Court: It is over.
"Mr. Mayberry: You dirty sonofabitch."
(2) The second episode took place on the eighth day of the trial. A codefendant was cross-examining a prison guard and the court sustained objections to certain questions:
"Mr. Codispoti: Are you trying to protect the prison authorities, Your Honor? Is that your reason?
"The Court: You are out of order, Mr. Codispoti. I don't want any outbursts like that again. This 457*457 is a court of justice. You don't know how to ask questions.
"Mr. Mayberry: Possibly Your Honor doesn't know how to rule on them.
"The Court: You keep quiet.
"Mr. Mayberry: You ought to be Gilbert and Sullivan the way you sustain the district attorney every time he objects to the questions.
"The Court: Are you through? When your time comes you can ask questions and not make speeches."
(3) The next charge stemmed from the examination of an inmate about a riot in prison in which petitioner apparently was implicated. There were many questions asked and many objections sustained. At one point the following outburst occurred:
"Mr. Mayberry: Now, I'm going to produce my defense in this case and not be railroaded into any life sentence by any dirty, tyrannical old dog like yourself.
"The Court: You may proceed with your questioning, Mr. Mayberry."
(4) The fourth charge grew out of an examination of another defense witness:
"By Mr. Mayberry:
"Q. I ask you, Mr. Nardi, is that area, the handball court, is it open to any prisoner who wants to play handball, who cares to go to that area to play handball?
"A. Yes.
"Q. Did you understand the prior question when I asked you if it was freely open and accessible area?
"The Court: He answered your question. Let's go on.
"Mr. Mayberry: I am asking him now if he understands____
458*458 "The Court: He answered it. Now, let's go on.
"Mr. Mayberry: I ask Your Honor to keep your mouth shut while I'm questioning my own witness. Will you do that for me?
"The Court: I wish you would do the same. Proceed with your questioning."
(5) The fifth charge relates to a protest which the defendants made that at the end of each trial day they were denied access to their legal documents—a condition which the trial judge shortly remedied. The following ensued:
"Mr. Mayberry: You're a judge first. What are you working for? The prison authorities, you bum?
"Mr. Livingston: I have a motion pending before Your Honor.
"The Court: I would suggest____
"Mr. Mayberry: Go to hell. I don't give a good God damn what you suggest, you stumbling dog."
Meanwhile one defendant told the judge if he did not get access to his papers at night he'd "blow your head off." Another defendant said he would not sit still and be "kowtowed and be railroaded into a life imprisonment." Then the following transpired:
"Mr. Mayberry: You started all this bullshit in the beginning.
"The Court: You keep quiet.
"Mr. Mayberry: Wait a minute.
"The Court: You keep quiet.
"Mr. Mayberry: I am my own counsel.
"The Court: You keep quiet.
"Mr. Mayberry. Are you going to gag me?
"The Court: Take these prisoners out of here. We will take a ten minute recess, members of the jury."
459*459 (6) The sixth episode happened when two of the defendants wanted to have some time to talk to a witness whom they had called. The two of them had had a heated exchange with the judge when the following happened:
"Mr. Mayberry: Just one moment, Your Honor.
"The Court: This is not your witness, Mr. Mayberry. Keep quiet.
"Mr. Mayberry: Oh, yes, he is my witness, too. He is my witness, also. Now, we are at the penitentiary and in seclusion. We can't talk to any of our witnesses prior to putting them on the stand like the District Attorney obviously has the opportunity, and as he obviously made use of the opportunity to talk to his witnesses. Now____
"The Court: Now, I have ruled, Mr. Mayberry.
"Mr. Mayberry: I don't care what you ruled. That is unimportant. The fact is____
"The Court: You will remain quiet, sir, and finish the examination of this witness.
"Mr. Mayberry: No, I won't be quiet while you try to deny me the right to a fair trial. The only way I will be quiet is if you have me gagged. Now, if you want to do that, that is up to you; but in the meantime I am going to say what I have to say. Now, we have the right to speak to our witnesses prior to putting them on the stand. This is an accepted fact of law. It is nothing new or unusual. Now, you are going to try to force us to have our witness testify to facts that he has only a hazy recollection of that happened back in 1965. Now, I believe we have the right to confer with our witness prior to putting him on the stand.
"The Court: Are you finished?
"Mr. Mayberry: I am finished.
"The Court: Proceed with your examination."
460*460 (7) The seventh charge grew out of an examination of a codefendant by petitioner. The following outburst took place:
"By Mr. Mayberry:
"Q. No. Don't state a conclusion because Gilbert is going to object and Sullivan will sustain. Give me facts. What leads you to say that?"
Later petitioner said:
"Mr. Mayberry: My witness isn't being in an inquisition, you know. This isn't the Spanish Inquisition."
Following other exchanges with the court, petitioner said:
"Mr. Mayberry: Now, just what do you call proper? I have asked questions, numerous questions and everyone you said is improper. I have asked questions that my adviser has given me, and I have repeated these questions verbatim as they came out of my adviser's mouth, and you said they are improper. Now just what do you consider proper?
"The Court: I am not here to educate you, Mr. Mayberry.
"Mr. Mayberry: No. I know you are not. But You're not here to railroad me into no life bit, either.
"Mr. Codispoti: To protect the record____
"The Court: Do you have any other questions to ask this witness?
"Mr. Mayberry: You need to have some kind of psychiatric treatment, I think. You're some kind of a nut. I know you're trying to do a good job for that Warden Maroney back there, but let's keep it looking decent anyway, you know. Don't make it so obvious, Your Honor."
"Mr. Mayberry: You're arguing. I'm not arguing, not arguing with fools."